The author argues that our current educational system—especially at the middle and high‑school levels—is fundamentally flawed because it relies on standardized, compartmentalized teaching that leaves students unmotivated and ill‑prepared to prevent future problems like war and poverty. They claim that real learning happens when a student actively studies something they are genuinely interested in, for a few weeks, which unlocks lasting skills and knowledge. By moving away from rigid subject divisions and grade‑based rewards toward individualized, project‑based, hands‑on experiences (e.g., 3D printing, programming, DIY drones), schools could create instant, life‑lasting results and give children the tools to become wise and great beings. The post concludes that parents and teachers must revive this personalized approach so kids can grow fully and carry their culture’s wisdom forward.

The post argues that while machine‑learning is still an emerging technology, true AI will eventually be able to read, explain and improve its own code; it then explores the difficulty of generating digital products—especially code—by describing how a complex code generator can produce simple, bug‑free programs such as Bootstrap cards, yet remain limited by programming conventions and human expectations, and suggests that generative art and music illustrate the potential for AI to learn from existing digital artifacts, while recognizing that large projects like full Bootstrap themes are still too complex for one person but may become feasible with a machine’s own assembly logic.

In this post the author argues that drawing with pencil is essential for learning programming, describing how visual sketches help understand and remember concepts. He explains that a program can be seen as a diagram of nodes (major steps) connected by edges (links), each edge carrying its own snippet of code; the diagram thus becomes a “file pane” of the editor. The post stresses that while REPLs and computers are useful, they cannot replace the creative act of sketching—each line or circle in a drawing has meaning only within that visual context—and that this dream‑like visual thinking ultimately produces the actual code.

In the post, the author outlines a strategy for creating an efficient, cross‑platform application that runs on a Raspberry Pi and can be hosted in a colocation facility, emphasizing the use of JavaScript both on the server (via Koa or Express) and client side to avoid language switching. They recommend using PouchDB with Bootstrap and Svelte for an offline‑first, mobile‑first UI that scales well to desktop, and stress the importance of responsive design and low traffic. To streamline development, they propose building a code generator—specifically a Cytoscape‑JS graph interface on the front end and a collection of Node module templates on the back end—that automates repetitive coding tasks, saves time, and can be packaged as sellable themes or plugins for new technologies learned along the way.

The post argues that an EventEmitter is a fundamental programming concept—much like classes or try/catch—and explains why it’s especially valuable in modern frameworks such as Svelte. In Svelte, developers typically build a “pyramid” of state: a top‑level data object whose fragments are passed down to components. While this works for small, self‑contained apps, integrating external services (auth, databases, websockets) can become cumbersome; an EventEmitter lets components broadcast and listen for events across the entire pyramid without rigid structural rules, creating a spiderweb of communication. The author notes that junior developers sometimes view EventEmitters as “evil” but they actually simplify data flow and UI structure—illustrated by a complex properties pane that reacts to a single “selected” event and persists changes via an “save” event—showing how this pattern can make building applications quick, powerful, and visually intuitive.

In late September 2022, I began an experiment by attaching a fluffy tail to myself to explore whether humans would respond differently to a full prosthetic tail—an inquiry I intended to publish in the Journal of Science years later. During October, people initially ignored me until the 20th, after which they greeted me with smiles and kindness; this shift spurred personal growth: my programming skills surged (thanks to Svelte, PouchDB, Cytoscape‑js, and CodeMirror6), I lifted heavier weights, became more cheerful, improved my music composition, and even recalled a childhood song about a mixed‑breed puppy. The tail experiment has thus catalyzed both social interactions and creative development in my life.

The post argues that, while high‑quality studio samples and perfectly synthesized sounds sound nice on paper, the real magic of music comes from complex, noisy, and surprising elements that keep a song interesting far longer than predictable patterns—something especially true for workout tracks that need to sustain energy over time. Using a 1929 Jimmie Rodgers track (“Waiting for a Train”) as an example, the author shows how short random snippets can be stitched together with added noise to create fresh beats; simple techniques like low‑pass filtering on loud sounds or even tapping a mic can yield drum-like instruments. Overall, the piece celebrates randomness and old technology as powerful tools for crafting engaging, unique music.

To become a programmer you need self‑study, patience, and a solid environment: start with a free Debian GNU/Linux system on inexpensive hardware such as an 8 GB Raspberry Pi 4; choose JavaScript/ES2023 as the first language because it powers the web and will stay relevant for decades; use vim (preferably SpaceVim) as your editor to master terminal‑based coding; then begin with simple command‑line Node.js programs, employing modules like commander for CLI handling and sharp for image processing.

The post uses an operating‑system metaphor to argue that human minds are dynamic, evolving machines whose education can be upgraded much like software updates. It claims that standardized learning feels like eating the same “broccoli” over and over, whereas personalized, technology‑driven instruction—especially via smartphones—lets learners build their own knowledge paths, experiment with real projects, and earn rewards for solving problems. By creating a privacy‑respecting, self‑paced school where students can freely assemble curricula, collaborate online, and gain experience through bounties, the author believes individuals will feel empowered, overcome poverty fears, and continually refine their skills, just as an OS is upgraded or replaced to improve performance.

Research shows that having a tail—whether literal or metaphorical—offers practical benefits: it helps distribute weight, supports the back, and can even enhance intelligence. The post emphasizes that animals from squirrels to whales naturally possess tails, suggesting humans could benefit similarly. It stresses choosing a tail that fits one’s scale and size, implying careful selection is essential. Finally, it playfully suggests wearing a tail for style—whether on Halloween or year‑round—to feel mighty and strong.

Our world is complex, yet cultures are destined to converge toward wisdom and peace. Young people struggle to grasp group identities, often simplifying them with the vague “they,” which deepens divisions and fuels conflict—an old trick that exploits our minds’ need for coherent narratives. When we accept falsehoods as truths, our worldview warps, and groups hate each other because of these shared lies rather than any real difference. Children can quickly abandon local labels if taught to build their own certainties: they must learn to evaluate assumptions and check premises. Schools were intended as the cradle of modern civilization, pushing beyond “them” into deeper understanding; however, this often forces children to disobey parents and politicians to cling to status quo. Yet the real task is elevating all cultures through wisdom so they unite without conflict. Standardized schooling has become factory‑like, prompting self‑education as a replacement. The world’s mission—to end poverty, lift cultures, grow, learn, rise—remains in our nature; one day students will marvel at how we once demanded obedience yet hoped for change.

The post is an introspective ode to becoming a “great being” through the synthesis of art, philosophy, and personal experience: it urges the reader to cultivate poetry, music, invention, and wisdom, all inspired by ancient philosophers and cosmic wonder; it weaves together poetic reflection on life’s cycles, the transformative power of books, and the author’s own sailing adventures as a means of self‑discovery

I’ve been thinking about writing a book since high school, but my idea of what a book is has evolved into an audio‑book project that lasts for hundreds of hours—each 10‑minute poem a small chapter in a larger program that adapts to the listener’s mind. I started with simple verses and now weave them into software‑development themes, treating each recording as a dynamic “software” upgrade for the mind rather than a static sheet of information. I see a 300‑hour audio book as roughly thirty separate books, and I repeat ideas often so they stick; I let my audience from many cultures hear the same thought in different ways. I keep it free to share, finish one project before starting another (calling it “Part Two”), and believe well‑narrated audiobooks are a way to move humanity toward the future.

The post paints a picture of today’s programming landscape—first‑hand tools feel clunky, especially on smartphones where you’re stuck with browsers and ad‑laden apps, yet JavaScript (with its server‑side runtimes) remains the de‑facto stack for web‑based projects. It proposes building an app by treating each feature like a wiki page: write a BDD description, then hand it off to other developers who can code the part for pay—essentially creating a marketplace of small modules that can be assembled into a full application. The writer suggests using modern front‑end frameworks (Bootstrap or Svelte) and offline support via PouchDB, while noting this “meta‑programming” model could help entrepreneurs pitch ideas to investors before anyone actually writes the code. In short, it’s an invitation to treat app development as a collaborative, feature‑by‑feature BDD process in a Wild West of programming.

Stepping into Philo Sophia—love of wisdom—reveals a reversal: great thinkers abandon gods and kings, rising from the dark corners of history and finding their power in books rather than miracles outside themselves. Young people, especially those who feel wronged, naturally inherit centuries of wisdom by asking “Who would I need to be to write like that?” and thus resurrect the spirits of philosophers. This inward expansion—what the author calls superpowers—is born from listening to well‑narrated nonfiction and adventure stories, which ignite inner force, joy, and unbreakable wisdom. By shifting our culture toward such inheritance, we can guard nature, peace, and authenticity for future generations, ensuring that the superpowers of humanity are nurtured through continuous learning and friendship across time.

The post argues that for modern web development one should pick popular, actively maintained open‑source tools—specifically Bootstrap, Svelte, and PouchDB (with its CouchDB back‑end). It explains how HTML, CSS and JavaScript are the core building blocks of the browser, and compares them to smartphones to show their ubiquity. Bootstrap is praised for giving ready‑made layout, menu and style components while keeping the underlying markup visible; Svelte is highlighted as a lightweight code generator that automatically updates the UI without bundling extra libraries; and PouchDB is presented as a JavaScript‑based in‑browser database that syncs with CouchDB to provide scalable persistence. Together, these three technologies form a long‑lasting stack that lets developers learn the fundamentals while benefiting from powerful abstractions, and the post even suggests experimenting by recreating CouchDB’s Futon UI using Svelte, Bootstrap and PouchDB as an exercise.

The post reflects on how teachers often fail to connect textbook knowledge with practical application—using examples such as projecting onto a canvas or teaching “programming a square” only in theory—and leave students with a superficial grasp of concepts like loops and hand‑eye coordination. The author argues that self‑education, through hands‑on projects, creative exploration (collage, design, programming) and learning from parents or personal practice, is essential for true mastery, especially in art, design and coding. He believes schools only cover basic reading, writing and arithmetic and that the real value lies in cultivating talent, knowledge and wisdom through continuous self‑learning.

For his part of adulthood, he suggests taking on a business venture to experience startup life and investor dynamics, while encouraging readers to reflect on their own educated selves—asking whether they would hire themselves and what that decision reveals about who they need to become. He stresses that true education is self‑driven: learning what one loves month after month, using tools like programming tutorials or design projects (e.g., wall projectors) as concrete feedback loops, and building a robust portfolio over time. By rejecting “fake” schooling and student‑loan traps, he argues we can genuinely graduate into authentic creators who grow continuously toward greatness.

The post reflects on how people begin as “warriors” but need to upgrade their worldview, recognizing that many seemingly good ideas can be easily distorted and therefore are unreliable. It criticizes a system where poverty forces teachers into rote teaching so students earn diplomas without true learning, creating a cycle of poverty and limited knowledge. The author argues that real education—and the cultural uplift needed to end poverty—comes from each person taking responsibility for their own learning: reading many respected books by celebrated thinkers, not just one or memorizing texts but engaging with ideas independently. By doing so, children can be given brighter futures and reminded that growing up means continually rising toward greatness.

In this essay the author argues that “being an intellectual” is not a fixed identity but a developmental phase—much like a child’s babbling—that gradually evolves through repeated synthesis of ideas into branching thought. He sketches a sequence of stages, culminating in what he calls the “great being” phase, where one makes lasting contributions to humanity via art, music, literature, and storytelling. The piece stresses that personal growth is meant to ease others’ lives even at one’s own cost, and it criticizes modern schooling as a paycheck mill that fails to nurture true intellectual independence. Ultimately he calls for continuous self‑education and cultural renewal so we may rise from the baby‑like repetition of words to creative synthesis and finally to enduring impact on the world.

Local HTTP servers are the ideal way to ship serious UI applications: a browser connects to a local port, allowing remote access, sharing, cross‑connection and portability (e.g., on an RPi). The entire stack runs in JavaScript—client side with HTML/JS and server side with plain JS—to keep things simple and web‑native. The interface is essentially a tree of nodes that can be decorated: tags for the pros, visual ports for artists, or familiar Finder‑style panes for novices; editors like CodeMirror/Ace provide built‑in code editing. Files are only generated on demand and aren’t the core of the program—each function lives in its own note with optional input/output schema and a unit‑test spot, enabling BDD per node (description, bounty, etc.). This modular, open‑source approach lets programmers build their own editor and showcase it as a portfolio piece.

The post reflects on the beauty of small “strange” programs—those whose lines of code relative to their usefulness reveal an elegant simplicity reminiscent of Unix’s “do one thing and do it well.” It praises editors, Wikipedia, early phones, and microjs.com as examples where minimalistic design yields powerful, flexible systems. By keeping command‑line tools tiny yet expressive (the filesystem tree, /proc, device files) and pairing them with simple UIs like dat.gui, developers can build robust yet controllable applications without overcomplicating the code. In short, the article celebrates how modest, oddly‑crafted programs become the backbone of powerful operating systems when left in their pure, unaltered form.

The post celebrates how adventure stories fuel our growth, imagination, and inner “warrior” spirit, and it argues that culture is never fixed but must evolve continuously to keep everyone moving forward together. It calls for education that keeps pace with the world so no one is left behind, and sees the modern warrior as a creator‑inventor who strives toward greatness through continual learning and invention.

Visual programming turns a simple list of eight questions into a network of interconnected boxes and lines: each question is first placed in a “list” box, then passed through an “ask” box that sends it to the user; lines connect these boxes, making the flow visible and allowing branching logic—completed answers go one way to a database‑save box while incomplete ones follow another path. Additional boxes can be inserted along any line, and each box has sockets for inputs and outputs; a logic box can fan out its virtual envelope into separate outputs (e.g., “complete,” “incomplete,” “error”), which then feed distinct downstream processes such as human resources or sales. In this way the entire workflow—from question retrieval to final human review—is abstracted into a visual, modular diagram that clarifies and streamlines the process.